Tak som si pozrel to video .. mame sa teda na co tesit .. co ma zaujalo , je fakt , ze nova karta nema vobec chladice na tych DSPckach ..
Celkom som zvedavy , ci QUAD karta sa bude tvarit ako single karta .. pouzit 4 quad karty , tak to ua bude realne brutalny DSP vykon ..
UAD2 Oficialne
Presne to som sa chcel spytat .. ci si myslite ze je to ten isty SHARC ktory pouzivali Creamware v Scope/Pulsar ..
Matucha : $2000 za 4 chipy je sakra malo .. ak by sme zobrali ten obrazok ktory tam bol pred tym , tak UAD2 Quad by mohol byt 12x rychlejsi .. Ak by sme zobrali cenu UAD1 $500 , tak UAD2 quad by mal stat 12x500= $6000 .. ak to bude za $2000 , tak TO JE ZADARMO !
Matucha : $2000 za 4 chipy je sakra malo .. ak by sme zobrali ten obrazok ktory tam bol pred tym , tak UAD2 Quad by mohol byt 12x rychlejsi .. Ak by sme zobrali cenu UAD1 $500 , tak UAD2 quad by mal stat 12x500= $6000 .. ak to bude za $2000 , tak TO JE ZADARMO !
OK .. dako to so dole .. Dnes stoji UAD1 u thomanna 266 euro ~ $400 ..
cize 12x$400 = $4800 .. Za $2000 by to bolo stale ZADARMO
Ale zasadna vec je , ze nejde o peniaze .. ale skorej o to, ze v komputri je malo slotov .. Dnes musi mupit magmu za $1000+ .. k tomu dalsie 3 uady1 ($1200) .. a mas len 4x vykon .. s novym udaom staci vymenit UAD1 za UAD2 quad , a dostavas sa na 12x vykon , bez nutnosti kupovat magmu ..
FAMOZNE ! Kde sa to da kupit ????
cize 12x$400 = $4800 .. Za $2000 by to bolo stale ZADARMO
Ale zasadna vec je , ze nejde o peniaze .. ale skorej o to, ze v komputri je malo slotov .. Dnes musi mupit magmu za $1000+ .. k tomu dalsie 3 uady1 ($1200) .. a mas len 4x vykon .. s novym udaom staci vymenit UAD1 za UAD2 quad , a dostavas sa na 12x vykon , bez nutnosti kupovat magmu ..
FAMOZNE ! Kde sa to da kupit ????
jo to mame...
tady nekdo trochu porovnaval vypocetni vykon pouzitejch sharc chipu
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoL View Post
A very quick Google search on the DSP chip yields the following:
tady nekdo trochu porovnaval vypocetni vykon pouzitejch sharc chipu
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoL View Post
A very quick Google search on the DSP chip yields the following:
The SHARC ADSP-21369 processor is a member of the Single-Instruction Multiple-Data (SIMD) family of signal processors that feature ADI's Super Harvard Architecture. It is a 32-/40-bit floating-point processor optimized for high-performance audio applications with 2Mb on-chip of SRAM and 6Mb of mask-programmable ROM, and multiple internal busses to eliminate I/O bottlenecks.
The processor uses two computational units to deliver a significant performance increase over previous SHARC processors on a range of signal-processing algorithms. With a 400 MHz (2.5ns) core instruction rate, the SHARC ADSP-21369 performs at 2.4 GFLOPS/800 MMACS.
That is peak performance. Not very useful for continuous audio processing. The sustained rate is 1.6 GFlops. So a UAD-2 Quad gives 6.4 Gigaflops (assuming nothing is lost by having to manage 4 processors). Now compare that to a single Intel Quad Core Hampertown which delivers about 80 GFlops... Yes all this processing power is shared with the OS and the DAW application but they probably use less than 1 GFlops together.
je to na zamyslenie... 4-jadrovy Intel stoji 25,-Dolacovmatucha píše:jo to mame...
tady nekdo trochu porovnaval vypocetni vykon pouzitejch sharc chipu
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoL View Post
A very quick Google search on the DSP chip yields the following:
The SHARC ADSP-21369 processor is a member of the Single-Instruction Multiple-Data (SIMD) family of signal processors that feature ADI's Super Harvard Architecture. It is a 32-/40-bit floating-point processor optimized for high-performance audio applications with 2Mb on-chip of SRAM and 6Mb of mask-programmable ROM, and multiple internal busses to eliminate I/O bottlenecks.
The processor uses two computational units to deliver a significant performance increase over previous SHARC processors on a range of signal-processing algorithms. With a 400 MHz (2.5ns) core instruction rate, the SHARC ADSP-21369 performs at 2.4 GFLOPS/800 MMACS.
That is peak performance. Not very useful for continuous audio processing. The sustained rate is 1.6 GFlops. So a UAD-2 Quad gives 6.4 Gigaflops (assuming nothing is lost by having to manage 4 processors). Now compare that to a single Intel Quad Core Hampertown which delivers about 80 GFlops... Yes all this processing power is shared with the OS and the DAW application but they probably use less than 1 GFlops together.
za 1500,-dolacov sa da kupit kopec dobrych pluginov (Waves, UAD, Sonnox, Abbey Roads...), ktore myslim su dostojnymi supermi UAD pluginom a latencia stale rovnaka...
